How did this loss happen?
Why were we not informed?
Join our team of plaintiffs
Watershed Debacle
the Government “Watershed Study” is Controlling Many Properties Across the Country
Unknown to many, a nationwide government “Watershed Study” has silently wielded control over numerous properties, leaving farmers and property owners at a loss, oblivious to the grave implications it carries.
The Tait family, hailing from Toronto, discovered the extent of this infringement when they sought to sever six two acre lots on their 150 acre property in Severn, Ontario. John Tait and his family, are appalled by the authorities actions and inactions. We now seek to raise awareness among fellow landowners regarding the watershed infringement and obvious monetary losses. Minimum 100K on each property.
SURPRISE RESPONSE FROM PLANNING.
The Taits are disgusted …..remove this DISCRIMINATORY watershed encumbrance from private properties.
EMAIL FROM SENIOR PLANNER:
“2715 Janes Lane, in Severn Township, owned by Tait’s is not eligible for six severances. The property is primarily designated green land (see image below with the GREEN color) in the County of Simcoe’s Official Plan, which does not permit development, including new lot creation within the GREEN land designation. The BROWN area on the image below is designated rural and may be permitted to provide a new lot, however, all applicable land use planning policy documents would need to be complied with so a “Land Use Planning Consultant” would likely need to be retained in order to justify any lot creation within the BROWN rural area of the property.”
The same senior planner, at a separate meeting told us that we could do “NOTHING” with our property.
“Why did authorities do this to us this appears to be tort negligence, breach of trust, fraud, discrimination and mischief? We believe we know.
Q1. This GREEN zone, aka watershed, did NOT control our property ten years ago when we applied for nine two-acre lots. STILL IN EFFECT. By who, why, how, and when, was this infringement initiated?
Q2. Are taxpayers being forced to hire others to correct the negligence and “breach of trust” by planners? Is this self serving cronyism?
Q3. It appears that the lawyers that “WE RETAINED” failed us and allowed this infringement. Are they complicit?
Discrimination? Corruption? see our LEGAL narrative.
The TAIT family are left with about four acres of property. Under Tort and Common Law we want our losses paid back, and so should you. This appears to be expropriation on behalf of the federal government, and is just more property control. We are intent on finding out who decided to encumber our property and yours. CONTROL!
We need to subpoena, from authorities, all documentation on the properties of each plaintiff and defendant along with the Risk Management Studies.
See the BROWN usable areas along the waterfront this is discrimination against us and all our GREENED OUT neighbours. SEE BELOW.
WAKE UP and SIGN UP. TELL FRIENDS.
THIS IS OUR MESSAGE
What has happened behind the scenes in our beautiful Severn Township? Misrepresentation by our protectors? Deceit or naivety or possibly paid off by the federal regime? What happened to our “TRUSTEES?” They are breaching their own mission statements. Did they swear allegiance to us or to whom?
United Nations? The real answer is scary.
WHAT STARTED THIS INQUIRY ? see “THE STORY” and “WAKE UP ” sections
To understand why, follow those that do. Watch the Aurora video. Joel Sussman, Cheryl Gallant, Sheila McFarlane, and Maggie Braun all know what is happening. Working hard for you.
Joel explains the “agenda” in the Aurora meeting. See the video in the “WAKE UP” page.
Great witnesses, and along with other would-be informants, we hope to bring our landowners together and regain control and proper ownership.
CHANGE THIS NOW! CLASS ACTION?
Empowered by this website and with the support of fellow claimants, the Tait family takes up the mantle of investigating this matter on behalf of all property owners. The objective is a class action suit, if necessary, to recoup losses.
WAKE-UP SIGN UP FOR FREE
The core focus of this investigation is to shed light on the potential “breach of trust” and “lack of duty of care” exhibited by officials, and the far-reaching impact on “we the people” including our family, our kids, and our friends.
REMOVE THE WATERSHED from private lands and we can BUILD HOMES FOR OUR FAMILIES.
THIS WATERSHED IS A SCAM.
We encourage you to determine whether or not you qualify to participate in our “potential” class-action suit and stand in solidarity with property owners, deceived by omission and contractual breach according to our constitutional laws.
Remember this. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
– Edmund Burke
DESTRUCTION OF OUR LAND HAS STARTED WITH THE WATERSHED!
The following is a lengthly video, that will bring you up to date on the issues landowners are facing.
Unwittingly, maybe? Mayors and Councillors are allowing this to happen to Canadian families. Council and Planning need to stop following “globalist mandates”. Our boards are taking orders from the“globalist agenda” to control our private property. We, not they, are losing equity in our retirement plans. A very underhanded slow encroachment.
GLOBALIST MANDATES 2030 PLAN: You will own nothing and be happy!
https://gab.com/Boerevrou/posts/112451132376657533
SOLUTION:
Sign up with the Tait Family Investigation and Lawsuit.
Follow the local Parallel Investigations.
“POGG” “KICLEI” & “ACTION4CANADA”
The Video Below Explains What Was Done To “We The People” Without Our Consent.
https://kiclei.substack.com/p/introduction-to-kiclei?utm_source=publication-search
OUR STRATEGY: UNVEILING THE NEGLIGENCE
A CALL TO ACTION FOR AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS THAT MAY HAVE LOST A MINIMUM OF $100,000.
We have input from professional independent mathematicians. Through a preliminary common-sense review of properties subjected to watershed infringement, we have found the following:
Considering the exorbitant real estate prices and local planners’ suppression of actual monetary losses, we estimate that individual landowners may have suffered a minimum loss of $100,000 (One hundred thousand dollars) per property, without accounting for potential additional losses in venture projects. (refer to losses) in “REALTY”.
WE THE TAXPAYERS WANT CONTROL OF OUR PROPERTY, AS WE SHOULD HAVE BY LAW, OR PAY US.
JOIN OUR LIST OF PLAINTIFFS FOR FREE – CHECK IF YOU QUALIFY.
Note: COMMON SENSE indicates that any encumbrance on a property reduces the value.
“EXPROPRIATION?”
This “investigation” aims to expose how planners and authoritative figures withheld or omitted vital information from landowners, leading to significant monetary losses. Due to their “negligence,” they may face a class-action lawsuit to recover these losses, which, at this initial stage, could potentially reach millions of dollars (see “LEGAL” for Tort Law).
We need to know who the “authority figures” are. They had an obligation but may have failed, to notify us, the taxpaying landowners of this debacle. The Tait family was not protected. WAS YOURS?
To participate, potential claimants are required to Sign up using our MailChimp Platform. First, establish legitimate involvement. THE LOSSES CAN BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE. See (“REALTY”)
We demand the planning department formulas that they used for determining landowner losses and tax reductions. These documents should reflect the percentage loss on each property. Where are the ledgers? Are “risk management” findings available?
John Tait attempted to obtain satellite overlay imagery regarding the watershed infringement from the planning department but received limited response. The lack of direct public access to satellite imagery raises concerns about information transparency and legitimacy. We the Tait’s were informed, about the watershed, only when we attempted to propose six lots. SURPRISE!
THERE ARE SEVEN PRINCIPLES OF RISK MANAGEMENT.
Projects of all sizes necessitate risk management, particularly when innocent landowners are at risk. We demand to know who the risk managers are and where their reports are, to ensure that risks and losses are identified early and dealt with appropriately on behalf of taxpayers. (see risk management principles).
After self-qualification, join the info. list at the bottom of the page and sign up. LATER WE WILL REQUIRE THE PERCENTAGE OF ENCUMBERED PROPERTY FOR EACH PLAINTIFF. This will be calculated as the difference between the property value with the watershed infringement and its value without the watershed infringement. See (DIY in “REALTY”)
To protect security and privacy, we utilized the “Mailchimp” platform.
This investigation and a potential lawsuit are founded on the negligent lack of official information and transparency displayed by authorities. This deprivation of taxpayers’ rights and lack of notification to appeal within the legal 30-day limit, is total negligence. The planning department’s risk management findings should support our claims.
This investigation and the potential lawsuit should demonstrate that landowners were not adequately informed about potential losses or applicable tax reductions. We assert that the planning department’s inaction and information suppression within the watershed rollout severely damaged our properties’ market value, resulting in over-taxation. This is about CONTROL. Entire segments of PRIVATE PROPERTY have been suppressed over a relatively short time. We must bring those segments back up to market value.
SEE M.P. CHERYL GALLANT IN THE “WAKEUP” – A TRUE PATRIOT.
WE DEMAND OUR LOSSES BE RIGHTFULLY RETURNED OR WITHDRAW THE WATERSHED……WAKE UP SIGN UP*
The government’s watershed guideline, spanning about 300 pages, represents a professionally crafted obfuscation and betrayal of property owners’ rights. We demand access to reports and spreadsheets describing the losses and re-assessments of equity. Subpoena or Foia? We must demand OUR documents regarding the appeal, done on behalf of us, the people. Who did that loss assessment? OR did they? If so, were they afraid to tell us our losses?
How about OUR Lawyers, the ones that we retained to protect us, we the people, AND our representatives, did they advise our representatives to inform us of the consequences, of the watershed encumbrance? Complicit? Subpoena? or are they going to represent us? Arms length?
Through testimony, we seek to understand why the illegal invasive watershed study exists. We need to see what relevant documents were presented to property owners or if they were hidden? We propose that all legal issues related to our ecosystem should be put on hold until resolved or dissolved. Previous proposals presented to the council should be revisited. It would be appropriate to subpoena the satellite imagery of defendants properties to see if they too lost equity. DISCRIMINATION maybe?
We are confident that the “100,000 dollar minimum loss” suffered by our proud and concerned landowners will encourage them to spread the word to friends and neighbors. We plan to present “The Story” to a prominent “landowner-centric magazine,” directing landowners to our website for participation in the potential class-action lawsuit.
THIS MAY LEAD TO A NATIONWIDE INVESTIGATION WITH MULTIPLE CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS WITH THIS WEBSITE OR THE DISSOLUTION OF THE WATERSHED ENCUMBRANCE.
TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR PROPERTY, AND JOIN THE TEAM.
POINTS TO PROVE
We are compiling an ongoing comprehensive case study comprising relevant questions to bring forward all the facts. Potential claimants and their families should carefully review all questions to determine eligibility as participants.
The Main Question is WERE YOU OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED?
5 POINTS TO PROVE IN A TORT OF NEGLIGENCE CASE ARE:
1. AS THE DEFENDANTS OWE THE LANDOWNERS “DUTY OF CARE” AS PROFESSIONALS REPRESENTING WE THE PEOPLE.
2. THE DEFENDANTS BREACHED THEIR “DUTY OF CARE” AND PROTECTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE “REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD”.
3. DEFENDANTS CAUSED INJURY OR “EXCESSIVE LOSS OF EQUITY” IN THIS CASE BY THEIR OWN NEGLIGENCE.
4. DEFENDANTS IGNORED THE FORESEEABLE LOSSES BY THE “REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD”.THIS IS NEGLIGENCE.
5. PLAINTIFFS CLAIM FOR FINANCIAL LOSSES. MOST LOSSES WOULD EXCEED $100,000.00.
NOT UNREALISTIC BY CURRENT MARKET STANDARDS THIS IS EQUITY LOSS AND UNDER TORT LAW ARE DAMAGES.
IMPORTANT:
ALL BEING SAID AND QUESTIONED
According to the trending, none the less legal PEACE, ORDER, and GOOD GOVERNMENT doctrine, the current municipal boards are over-reaching in their authority.
P.O.G.G. acknowledgements:
Shelagh McFarlane, Gillian Purkiss, and Maggie Hope Braun
GATHER YOUR PROPERTY INFORMATION
Prepare and organize all details related to your property for use in the legal process. A well-organized group of landowners will strengthen our case. Points to prove are #1. You own the subject property and were not officially notified by persons in authority ie: Mayor, councilors, planners and inspectors.
As a result you may have lost more than 100,000 dollars.
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS AND RIDE THE DOCUMENT CONVOY
After reviewing and answering the questions, if you believe you qualify for the class-action suit, proceed to SIGN UP at the bottom of the page AND keep up to date with progress.
STAY UPDATED & INFORMED
We will provide updates as issues arise. Stay informed about this evolving situation.
PREMIERE DOUG FORD
REMINDER: We have been in touch with you since January 2024. Your office stated that there were great things happening in April / May 2024. So far… CRICKETS!
I see that you tossed 6 million plus tax dollars at affordable homes in Barrie. What does that cover? The drawings or maybe 10 homes? What stupid people are you jumping for? Certainly not landowners that have invested in their family needs and cannot move forward. That will be the legacy of “private property watershed”.
Regardless of one’s political leanings, working-class families should appreciate that your objectives are hopefully, attainable. We understand that progress is often hindered by adverse blockades, some of which you can hold yourself accountable for. Despite the cloud, the Tait’s commend you for addressing issues and challenges posed by unnecessary RED TAPE. that slows progress and growth for families.
However, there is a pressing matter that demands attention—that disgusting FEDERAL WATERSHED STUDY, which appears to be a questionable and controlling mechanism on private property. We urge you to read and consider the implications outlined at www.watersheddebacle.ca (a work in progress).
The Tait family, like many others, was completely unaware of the complications imposed by this infringement until we attempted to move forward with the help of the MORE HOMES Act. The lack of proper briefing regarding the catastrophic loss of equity, time, and expense for landowners likely stems from a blatant disregard and lack of concern by immediate individual authorities who seem to seek control or bow to the federal regime. Authorities do have a “duty of care” under Tort Law so we question what they may be hiding. We need to recoup our losses and taxes.
The planning departments may have been deceived themselves by the implementation of this illegal destructive watershed study and property control. Please have the FEDS cancel this encumbrance or assist authoritarians to cover our losses. We do not need taxpayers covering legal fees for negligent authoritarians. If we must hire private planners they must hire private lawyers.
MR. PREMIER, THIS INVESTIGATION IS IN PROGRESS, AND READY FOR MEDIA RELEASE. WE KINDLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONTACT US FOR AN UPDATE. Thank you for your attention.
Sincerely, John Tait and Family
NOTE: A full letter was sent to Doug Ford, Pierre Poilievre, and Tim Hudak head of OREA
Here are the links below
letter to Tim Hudak
Letter to Doug Ford
NOTICE: All communication with politicians will be recorded on this website. Responses positive or negative will be updated in the Blog section.
So far Ford’s office has said there are big changes for April and May 2024. We will See!
ONTARIO REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATION (OREA)
OREA does not mention the watershed encumbrance in the form 100 purchase and sale agreement. Were they NOT NOTIFIED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?
AS OUTLANDISH AS IT MAY SEEM
It is evident that governments utilize diverse methodologies to shape public opinion and regulate the flow of information. Even local municipalities may find themselves subject to influence from higher tiers of governance. Throughout history, we have witnessed the implementation of measures aimed at controlling thought, including media censorship, dissemination of misinformation and disinformation, propagation of propaganda, indoctrination within educational institutions, restriction of access to specific technologies or communication channels, and even resorting to coercion and intimidation to suppress dissenting voices. Their adeptness in employing such tactics is notable. These practices are widely regarded as unethical and contravene fundamental human rights, including the rights to freedom of expression and thought. Furthermore, the control exerted over private properties can serve as a potent means to impede the advancement of families, inflicting considerable mental and physical strain. Reference to (WAKE UP) is made, urging readers to disseminate this information among their acquaintances.
The watershed infringement can be subtly introduced into an area, leaving even real estate professionals unaware of the true purpose of this encroachment and the genuine value of the property, thus failing to account for resultant losses. This encroachment harbors the potential to consign an entire locale to a state of inertia and despondency. Property owners may remain oblivious until necessitated to conduct a title search, at which juncture they may not fully grasp the implications. Should they endeavor to develop the property, this encumbrance will exact a heavy toll. Notably, the planning department neither apprised nor cautioned property owners regarding this predicament; yet now, they demand remuneration from landowners for the mere possibility of securing approval, an egregious demand indeed. While it may appear incredulous, the repercussions are palpable and profound.
THIS IS RESEMBLING THE TREATMENT METED OUT BY NOBLEMEN TO THEIR SERFS….. Government personnel are remiss in serving the interests of their constituents.
John Tait
Help us to fight back! SIGN UP as a plaintiff.
HOW DID THEY DO THAT?
OPPRESSION : “THE STATE OF BEING SUBJECT TO UNJUST TREATMENT or CONTROL”
The same way that they deceived our farmers, by reducing their yields, their property values, and operating lines by 30%. Why was there no 30% property tax reduction? Was this to control food supply? Why are there no law suits? Here is the link Check out Redacted
The same way that they buried all of us in mandates and forced businesses to lay off employees or shut down. They were using fiat, counterfeit tax money, to do it. Why? To control Income?
The same way that they got control of the media to misinform “we the victims”.
Did they control police thuggery by invoking a “war measures act”? Did they pay off greedy politicians to abuse working people and walk on constitutional rights? Why? Just control?
The same way that they, in conjunction with the banking cartels, shut down bank accounts. Why? Control and create chaos?
Look up the 15 minute cities. THE NEW LOCKDOWNS. This action is before the courts now in Britain.
WATERSHED INFRINGEMENT
Taking total control of a country’s property would be the totalitarianism ’s dream and that is what this looks like to us. “You will own nothing and be happy.” Were they hoping for forfeiture ? Maybe?
This watershed debacle is a federal program. It was brought in while we the landowners were distracted by those hundreds of tyrannical moves that the government has been making over the last 60 years, culminating in the last 5 years.
We believe that the reason we and our realtors were not notified by our planning department officials regarding this study was because this would have raised the ire of some astute individuals. This would be far too transparent.
The Tait family certainly was not informed and in fact has an original pending 10 year old, preliminary proposal before council. Nine two acre lot severances presented prior to the watershed infringement. This is the recent “eyes open” moment for us.
At a June meeting in 2022 the senior planner advised that the Tait’s could do “nothing” with the property. In this case the conservative (ridiculous) potential losses to date would be in excess of one million dollars plus the actual losses in the amount of three hundred thousand and a tax reduction. Ridiculous but not out of line with today’s construction costs and this meets with professional engineering expectations in the building industry.
We would expect, judging by the number of potential class action participants at this time, that we may accumulate well over one hundred claimants just in the Severn area. We may need to address the issue with a protest while our farmers are still standing up. Thank you TAMARA LICH
Our initial investigation will encompass Severn Township and expand from there based on postal codes. Any qualified landowner in Ontario can sign up. According to the OFA there are 38000 farms in Ontario not including other properties like the Tait’s. If Ontario farms alone lose 100k dollars each, at the minimum, that is 3,800,000,000 (3.8 billion) dollars. That is Just farms.
WORK IN PROGRESS. We are intent on pursuing the planning departments for their “misrepresentation of known facts” and breaching well founded “tort law” resulting in astronomical losses to landowners. This has all the appearances of a “partial expropriation of private property” without an appeal process. We are seeking compensation. We are doing the basic investigation and we are seeking more lawyers familiar with class action suits to represent our hardworking landowners and farmers. Please contact us at info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com (to follow).
We have no intention of pursuing the authors of the “watershed study” we have gotten no response from a FOIA request. We will let the Planning SUE the federal authors if the planners become defendants.
The Taits can show that this watershed study is flawed as it relates to the Tait property, and actually contradicts the stated goals of authority. The Tait’s do not expect to pay for the mistakes made by the authorities and we hope that all other landowners will pursue this stand. There are probably many other outside claimants and we should set the templates for other lawsuits. In the meantime we have 102 postal codes in Severn Township to deal with first.
In WAKE UP “HOLD THE LINE” book by TAMARA LICH A CANADIAN HERO.
EXPLORE THE QUESTIONS, QUALIFY FOR PARTICIPATION, AND STAY INFORMED WITH OUR PROGRESS.
To Reach out directly, connect using this email below
info.watersheddebacle@gmail.com
Membership is completely FREE
Join our info list
